JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 26, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Daniel Mauricio Perez Linarez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma rechazo por haber operado el fenómeno de cosa juzgada
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Plena de la Corporación decide CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 21 de agosto de 2018, proferido por la Magistrada Ponente Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Daniel Mauricio Pérez Linares contra el inciso 4° (parcial) de la Ley 270 de 1996 Ley Estatutaria de Administración de Justicia, con radicado D-12817.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 21 de agosto de 2018, proferido por la Magistrada Ponente Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Daniel Mauricio Perez Linares contra el inciso 4deg (parcial) del articulo 130 de la Ley 270 de 1996 Ley Estatutaria de administracion de Justicia, con radicado D-12817.
  2. Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
  3. Publiquese y Cumplase,
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR que a traves de la Secretaria General se NOTIFIQUE el presente proveido al ciudadano Daniel Mauricio Perez Linares.
  5. Notifiquese, publiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.